![]() ![]() “In this case, Colorado seeks to force an individual to speak in ways that align with its views but defy her conscience about a matter of major significance. ![]() “The First Amendment’s protections belong to all, not just to speakers whose motives the government finds worthy,” Gorsuch continued. “The First Amendment prohibits Colorado from forcing a website designer to create expressive designs speaking messages with which the designer disagrees,” states the majority opinion, written by Justice Neil Gorsuch. The Supreme Court has heard similar cases in the past – and declined to take up others – yet has danced around the key questions that arise in these lawsuits. The case is hugely important in that it adds clarity to the clash between our constitutional rights to free speech and religious freedom and the rights of LGBTQ+ individuals through public accommodation laws. Supreme Court upheld Smith’s rights to decline creating messages about marriage that would violate her religious beliefs. After a seven-year court battle, the website designer from Colorado received a win from the highest court in the land Friday. Lorie Smith can breathe a sigh of relief.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |